Australian
casino, hotel, entertainment and VIP high roller casino
war escalates; State Of Origin - NSW, QLD - Echo Entertainment
VS Crown Limited; This casino war ain't no game...
-
29th June 2013


Profiles
Echo
Entertainment The
Star Crown
Limited James
Packer Casinos
Australian
Casinos Sydney

Australian
casino, hotel, entertainment and VIP high roller casino
war escalates; State Of Origin - NSW, QLD - Echo Entertainment
VS Crown Limited; This casino war ain't no game...
-
29th June 2013

The
official promotional blurb for the exclusive Sovereign
Room at the Star casino in Sydney describes it as
a luxurious oasis, with unparallelled levels of service.
It
is a "private area featuring exclusive salons
[that] offers personalised service, premium tables
and an exclusive dining room and outdoor terrace".
No
mention that word on the street and in the casino
biz is that it's understood to be quite the hangout
for notorious drug dealers, fraudsters and suspected
money launderers... you get the idea.
This
less flattering picture emerged during the two recent
investigations into the Star - one statutory, one
extraordinary - by NSW gaming authorities.
A
December 2011 statutory licence review discovered
that "reports of suspected money laundering at
the Star have varied between none and five each quarter"
between 2009 and 2011, and cited a case study involving
the Sovereign Room.
(In
fairness, it also reported that the federal government
agency AUSTRAC rated the Star "more favourably
than other casinos" in regards to how it monitors
money laundering.)
Other
accusations emerged during last year's extraordinary
inquiry into the Star by the NSW Independent Liquor
and Gaming Authority after an episode involving the
sacking of casino managing director Sid Vaikunta for
sexual harassment.
The
inquiry's final report noted police were "looking
into" two anonymous complaints that "named
convicted drug dealers and 'fraudsters' were permitted
to gamble in the Sovereign Room".
More
than a year has passed since the inquiry into the
Star was regularly making front page news.
But
the Sovereign Room and others like it such as its
Victorian equivalent, the Mahogany Room at competitor
Crown in Melbourne, are again at the centre of casino
policy in NSW.
The
difference this time around is that the focus has
shifted from the behaviour of the players to the massive
amounts of money they gamble (and more importantly,
lose).
Known
in industry circles as "VIPs" or "whales",
these gamblers are a key target of the Star and its
parent company, Echo Entertainment, due to their willingness
to risk losses of at least $75,000 a year. This type
of wealthy gambler is also precisely the kind of customer
the gaming billionaire James Packer hopes to lure
to the invitation-only casino planned within his proposed
$1 billion hotel and apartment development at Barangaroo.
But
they are not found on every street corner. One estimate,
by gaming analyst Jennifer Owen, putting the total
number of local, or domestic, VIP players at fewer
than 8000 and international VIPs - primarily from
China - at a maximum of 2000.
Their
names are jealously guarded on secret lists held by
casino operators across the globe. Promises of privacy,
exclusivity and extraordinary luxury are used to lure
them.
This
week's unveiling of Echo's $1.1 billion upgrade plans
for the Star to compete with Packer's vision for Barangaroo
has sent the public competition for this type of customer
into overdrive.
Packer's
well-documented plan is for a 60-storey tower, featuring
80 multimillion-dollar apartments, a 350-room, six-star
hotel and "VIP-only" gambling rooms featuring
table games but no poker machines aka slots.
Echo's
proposal is to expand the Star to offer ''VVIP'' gambling
rooms, two new hotels and spend $130 million on local
public infrastructure, including a pedestrian and
cyclist bridge between Darling Island, near the Star
and Barangaroo.
But
Sunday's media conference to unveil Echo's pitch also
revealed a surprise twist: a promise that the company
will still commit to spending its $1.1 billion even
if the Packer casino goes ahead.
The
catch? That the government must agree to restrict
entry to Packer's casino to international and interstate
VIPs - shutting out gamblers from NSW.
At
a media conference on Sunday, Echo chief executive
John Redmond argued this was the accepted definition
of VIP customers.
Echo
chairman John O'Neill has since ramped up the attack,
declaring he was "concerned that the people of
NSW could be having the wool pulled over their eyes
by our competitor" about the nature of the Barangaroo
facility.
The
company fears the strategy from Packer's company,
Crown Limited, is to open its casino to anyone willing
to fill out a membership form. It says this is counter
to the strong impression Premier Barry O'Farrell has
given that the Packer casino would be the domain of
only the highest of high-rollers.
Privately
Echo's executives admit it's a strategy aimed squarely
at protecting Echo's domestic business.
As
far as O'Farrell's commentary is concerned, Echo certainly
has a point. In a bid to defend his ongoing advocacy
for such a project - which would effectively increase
the gambling offering in the state - the Premier has
routinely categorised it as out of reach from most
of those in NSW.
In
an interview with Fairfax - The Australian Financial
Review earlier this year the Premier was at pains
to talk up just how difficult it would be to gain
entry to the Packer casino.
"There
will be very few people of the net worth that is required
to be in those rooms," he said. "Presumably
if you're a local billionaire - I don't know whether
Gerry Harvey and Kerry Stokes are gamblers - but I
suspect if you're a billionaire, you might get an
invitation.
"But
if you're Barry O'Farrell, with a mortgage at Turramurra
I doubt that I'd ever be invited and I'm not
interested in gambling; I'm interested in the tourist
money."
O'Neill
even cheekily turned the comment back on O'Farrell
during Echo's media conference by stating VIP rooms
were "not for the mortgage payer in Turramurra".
But
in responding to Echo's attack, Crown points out -
correctly - that its initial statement to the stock
exchange was unambiguous on this point when the proposal
was announced.
It
told the market Crown was "proposing that VIP
gaming would only be available for international high-rollers,
mainly from Asia, together with interstate and local
VIP players on an invitation-only basis".
Echo's
concern is based on its belief that rather than growing
the market, a Packer casino would "cannibalise"
the revenue flowing to the Star from one of its most
important markets.
At
present, due to its position as Sydney's only casino
and the preference of VIPs for "table games"
the Star has the NSW domestic market to itself.
In
2012 it generated revenue of $123 million - more than
half the casino's total revenue take from VIPs that
year of $229 million, according to its annual report.
Importantly for Echo, it does not regard this as a
growth area.
An
analysis of the local market by Owen, as part of a
PricewaterhouseCoopers report commissioned by Echo,
puts the estimated number of "domestic VIP"
players in Australia at between 7000 and 8000.
"The
available market for players is small, and is not
growing rapidly, particularly in NSW," Owen's
report suggests.
In
terms of international VIPs, Owen acknowledges "massive
growth" in the market in Australia in recent
years due to the rapid economic growth in China.
The
numbers are mind-blowing. According to Owen's report
in 2012, $67 billion was turned over by international
VIPs in Australian casinos for losses of $1 billion.
This represented just 3 per cent of the global international
VIP market. Of this, turnover at the Star was about
$17 billion.
Unsurprisingly,
Echo and Crown have been pursuing this market with
equal vigour in recent years. It was the prime focus
of the Star's recently completed $870 million renovation.
If
Crown Sydney proceeds as planned, Owen's report sees
a potential growth in Sydney's international VIP market
of between 8-10 per cent, shared between Crown and
the Star.
But
the PwC report warns of quite a different outcome
in terms of domestic VIP business.
It
estimates that a second Sydney VIP casino would "cannibalise"
the Star's domestic business to the extent the NSW
government would be $14 million a year worse off in
gambling taxes by 2025.
Echo's
argument is that because revenue is progressively
taxed, leakage of half of its VIP business will result
in both casinos paying the lower tax rate of 27.5
per cent.
Crown
disputes this, accusing Echo of "small thinking"
on the issue which ignores the capacity to increase
the high-roller market, particularly from the Chinese
middle class. Crown says there is no shortage of international
VIPs.
Its
consultant, Allen Consulting group, has estimated
Crown Sydney would generate enough growth to deliver
an extra $114 million a year in gambling taxes.
The
O'Farrell government will decide whose project to
back primarily on advice from a panel chaired by businessman
David Murray about which offers the greatest net economic
benefit to NSW.
The
Murray panel will need to make sense of competing
claims on this point. Allen Consulting says it will
generate as much as $400 million in activity. PwC
puts it closer to $370 million and says the Star expansion
will generate activity of $350 million a year by 2025.
Critics
of both proposals, such as Greens MP John Kaye, point
out that the ''neither'' option doesn't appear to
be on the government's table.
Kaye
fears an expansion of VIP business will increase the
risk of the types of allegations levelled at the Sovereign
room in the past.
"In
the middle are the people of Sydney who are worried
that a new Barangaroo casino, a greatly expanded Star
or both would drive more problem gambling, increase
the corruption pressure on state regulators and risk
the consequences of large-scale money laundering,"
he says.
State
cabinet could be digesting Murray's recommendation
as soon as Monday, with a decision expected shortly
after that.
Websites
Echo
Entertainment
www.echoentertainment.com.au
Crown
Limited
www.crownlimited.com
The
Star
www.star.com.au
Casino
News Media
www.casinonewsmedia.com
Media
Man
www.mediaman.com.au
Media
Man Int
www.mediamanint.com


|